Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Munro
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization
Дата
Msg-id CA+hUKGKuxM94eVyBii=0e1bWpa-A05f2L6H-JSij0H5o7t+ZqA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization  (Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization  (Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 3:29 AM Konstantin Knizhnik
<k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> Attached please find rebased version of the patch.
> Also this version can be found in autoprepare branch of this repository
> https://github.com/postgrespro/postgresql.builtin_pool.git
> on github.

Thanks.  I haven't looked at the code but this seems like interesting
work and I hope it will get some review.  I guess this is bound to use
a lot of memory.  I guess we'd eventually want to figure out how to
share the autoprepared plan cache between sessions, which is obviously
a whole can of worms.

A couple of trivial comments with my CF manager hat on:

1.  Can you please fix the documentation?  It doesn't build.
Obviously reviewing the goals, design and implementation are more
important than the documentation at this point, but if that is fixed
then the CF bot will be able to run check-world every day and we might
learn something about the code.
2.  Accidental editor junk included:  src/include/catalog/pg_proc.dat.~1~


--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Mercha
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Extending PostgreSQL with a Domain-Specific Language (DSL) -Development
Следующее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bloom index cost model seems to be wrong