Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful
Дата
Msg-id CA+U5nMKQH4os5SJZ3DcnNVgS-nREt_Gb0+TfCfbMLruH_0Smpw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

> It wouldn't, although it might be bad in the case where there are lots
> of temp tables being created and dropped.

Do temp tables cause relcache invalidations?

That seems like something we'd want to change in itself.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful
Следующее
От: Yeb Havinga
Дата:
Сообщение: Pull up aggregate sublink (was: Parameterized aggregate subquery (was: Pull up aggregate subquery))