Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful
Дата
Msg-id 15009.1311708305@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>> Signals are already in use for special cases (queue is full), and I
>> think going through the kernel to achieve much more will lower
>> performance significantly.

> If there are no invalidations, there would be no signals. How would
> zero signals decrease performance?

But if there *is* an invalidation (which is not a negligible case),
it'd get significantly slower.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful
Следующее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful