On 21 June 2012 15:00, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
>> On 21 June 2012 08:30, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
>>> Nonetheless, it would be a good idea to prune the TODO list regularly,
>>> such as after a release. We used to do that a bit, not so much lately,
>>> perhaps. But everyone is invited to contribute to that.
>
>> The idea is to remove contentious issues from the list, to avoid the
>> waste of time.
>
> The thing is, a lot of stuff gets punted to the TODO list *because*
> it's contentious, ie there's not consensus on what to do. If there
> were consensus we might've just done it already. I'm not sure we want
> to remove such entries, though perhaps somehow marking them as debatable
> would be a good thing.
>
> There may well be stuff on the list that is no longer very relevant in
> today's world, but somebody would have to go through it item by item
> to decide which ones those are. I'm not volunteering.
<smiles> Understood
I'll have a play. Maybe I should just go with the idea of "Simon's
TODO List" - stuff I personally think is worth working on, and leave
it at that.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services