Re: Another unexpected behaviour

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: Another unexpected behaviour
Дата
Msg-id CA+U5nM+tKNQyAv9=nQcpiT3B4eJZssQhrdOfP3fsiBWzWZxqnA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Another unexpected behaviour  (Samuel Hwang <samuel@replicon.com>)
Ответы Re: Another unexpected behaviour  (Shianmiin <Shianmiin@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Samuel Hwang <samuel@replicon.com> wrote:

> The real question is that why PostgreSQL behaves differently than
> other major DBMS. IMHO, doing checking at set operation boundary is
> more appropriate than at row boundary.

The real question is why anyone would actually perform that kind of
UPDATE. It doesn't really make much sense to increment a PK value.

PostgreSQL is good at supporting things people want and need, so
differences do exist in places that are fairly low priority.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Another unexpected behaviour
Следующее
От: "Rob Richardson"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Another unexpected behaviour