Re: Another unexpected behaviour

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Rob Richardson
Тема Re: Another unexpected behaviour
Дата
Msg-id 04A6DB42D2BA534FAC77B90562A6A03D0193B117@server.rad-con.local
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Another unexpected behaviour  (Samuel Hwang <samuel@replicon.com>)
Ответы Re: Another unexpected behaviour  (Rick Genter <rick.genter@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
It seems to me that it is inherently wrong to perform any operation on a
database that depends on the order in which records are retrieved,
without specifying that order in an ORDER BY clause.  The "update t1 set
f1 = f1 + 1" assumes that the operation will be performed in an order
that guarantees that the highest unchanged record will be the next
record processed.  I don't believe that any database system should be
required to support an action like this.

RobR

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Another unexpected behaviour
Следующее
От: Rick Genter
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Another unexpected behaviour