On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> check-world isn't a magic bullet.
>
>> No, but deliberately leaving things out that could be run isn't
>> helping anything either.
>
> Tests that open security holes while running aren't in my list of "things
> that could be run automatically".
If we create a new target that runs them automatically, you don't have
to use it.
> In any case, you're in a poor position to whine about this given that
> parallel query is entirely unamenable to automated testing, and you've
> resisted past proposals for improving that situation.
Really?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company