Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size
Дата
Msg-id CA+Tgmobd5bCHA3rT1K6gmiV-JLbYODfcB_KMm34G=E10TfLOgg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:26 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Michael Paquier
>> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> No, because the output of SHOW is always of type text, regardless of
>>>> the type of the GUC.
>>>
>>> Thinking about that over night, that looks pretty nice. What would be
>>> nicer though would be to add INT8OID and BYTEAOID in the list, and
>>> convert as well the other replication commands. At the end, I think
>>> that we should finish by being able to remove all pq_* routine
>>> dependencies in walsender.c, saving quite a couple of lines.
>>
>> Might be worth investigating, but I don't feel any obligation to do
>> that right now.  Thanks for the review; committed.
>
> OK, I have done this refactoring effort as attached because I think
> that's really worth it. And here are the diff numbers:
>  3 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 162 deletions(-)
> That's a bit less than what I thought first because of all the
> singularities of bytea in its output and the way TIMELINE_HISTORY
> takes advantage of the message level routines. Still for
> IDENTIFY_SYSTEM, START_REPLICATION and CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT the
> gains in readability are here.

Seems OK to me, but I think I'd want to hear a few other opinions
before committing it.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal
Следующее
От: Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Add support to COMMENT ON CURRENT DATABASE