Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> Yeah, I thought about that, too, but it doesn't really seem worth it.
> If we had pg_receive_wal and pg_receive_logical, they'd be nicely
> consistent with each other, but inconsistent with practically every
> other utility we have: pg_basebackup, pg_archivecleanup,
> pg_controldata, etc.
Mmm, good point. I was looking at pg_test_fsync and pg_test_timing,
but those are the only exceptions, and they're only quasi-user-facing
anyway.
regards, tom lane