Re: Should we remove a fallback promotion? take 2

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Should we remove a fallback promotion? take 2
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmobSvv0o26672FW3A2W6=oR-uKFqCQ7Ag7ecft2RoeEO5A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Should we remove a fallback promotion? take 2  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
Ответы Re: Should we remove a fallback promotion? take 2  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 8:48 AM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
> We discussed the $SUBJECT six years ago at the following thread.
> https://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwGYkF+CvpOMdxaO=+aNAzc1Oo9O4LqWo50MxpvFj+0VOw@mail.gmail.com
>
> Seems our consensus at that discussion was to leave a fallback
> promotion for a release or two for debugging purpose or as
> an emergency method because fast promotion might have
> some issues, and then to remove it later. Now, more than six years
> have already passed since that discussion. Is there still
> any reason to keep a fallback promotion? If nothing, I'd like to
> drop it from v13.

Seems reasonable, but it would be better if people proposed these
kinds of changes closer to the beginning of the release cycle rather
than in the crush at the end.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Retiring support for pre-7.3 FK constraint triggers