Re: [HACKERS] Update description of \d[S+] in \?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Update description of \d[S+] in \?
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmobKAUxLJ+FX=AmhsP0Jzf4KcPiXKEoot7uap-ZLbD6a=g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Update description of \d[S+] in \?  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Update description of \d[S+] in \?  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> On 2017/07/13 19:57, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Amit Langote
>> <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>>> The description of \d[S+] currently does not mention that it will list
>>> materialized views and foreign tables.  Attached fixes that.
>>>
>>
>> I guess the same change is applicable to the description of \d[S+] NAME as well.
>
> Thanks for the review.  Fixed in the attached.

The problem with this, IMV, is that it makes those lines more than 80
characters, whereas right now they are not.  And that line seems
doomed to get even longer in the future.

Of course, having it be inaccurate is not great either.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Hash take II
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH v3] pg_progress() SQL function to monitorprogression of long running SQL queries/utilities