Re: pg_dump versus hash partitioning

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: pg_dump versus hash partitioning
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmobF7EwMQ0bR3ZPKdtuVa7jkixWQpm3AX6jwv6YD041EFw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_dump versus hash partitioning  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: pg_dump versus hash partitioning  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 11:20 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Well, that's a user error not pg_dump's fault.  Particularly so for hash
> partitioning, where there is no defensible reason to make the partitions
> semantically different.

I am still of the opinion that you're going down a dangerous path of
redefining pg_dump's mission from "dump and restore the database, as
it actually exists" to "dump and restore the database, unless the user
did something that I think is silly".

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Stale references to guc.c in comments/tests
Следующее
От: John Naylor
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum