Re: making bgworkers without shmem access actually not have shmem access

On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> I've complained about this problem a few times before: there's nothing
>> to prevent a background worker which doesn't request shared memory
>> access from calling InitProcess() and then accessing shared memory
>> anyway.  The attached patch is a first crack at fixing it.
>
>> Comments?
>
> Looks reasonable to me.

Thanks for the fast review.  Committed, after fixing one further bug I spotted.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company