Re: InsertPgAttributeTuple() and attcacheoff

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: InsertPgAttributeTuple() and attcacheoff
Дата
Msg-id CA+Tgmob3ALDbQD0j+F9Y6Du72LCJXzjWutog8tq8dLzjXWZ=HQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: InsertPgAttributeTuple() and attcacheoff  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: InsertPgAttributeTuple() and attcacheoff
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> It seems to me that it would make sense if InsertPgAttributeTuple() were
>> to set attcacheoff to -1 instead of taking it from the caller.
>
> Looked this over, no objections.
>
> I wonder whether we should set that field to -1 when we *read*
> pg_attribute rows from disk, and be less fussed about what gets written
> out.  The only real advantage is that this'd protect us from foolish
> manual changes to pg_attribute.attcacheoff entries, but that doesn't
> seem negligible.

I wouldn't object to forcibly writing in -1 when we read the data, but
I don't think it's a good idea to let values other than -1 get written
to the disk.  User-visible random nonsense in system catalogs seems
like too much of a foot-gun to me.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw withpartition wise join enabled.
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Improve behavior of concurrent ANALYZE/VACUUM