Re: InsertPgAttributeTuple() and attcacheoff

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: InsertPgAttributeTuple() and attcacheoff
Дата
Msg-id 5a54a8b6-fdb5-1b80-acd5-1024ef44c747@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: InsertPgAttributeTuple() and attcacheoff  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 14/08/2018 17:52, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>>> It seems to me that it would make sense if InsertPgAttributeTuple() were
>>> to set attcacheoff to -1 instead of taking it from the caller.
>>
>> Looked this over, no objections.
>>
>> I wonder whether we should set that field to -1 when we *read*
>> pg_attribute rows from disk, and be less fussed about what gets written
>> out.  The only real advantage is that this'd protect us from foolish
>> manual changes to pg_attribute.attcacheoff entries, but that doesn't
>> seem negligible.
> 
> I wouldn't object to forcibly writing in -1 when we read the data, but
> I don't think it's a good idea to let values other than -1 get written
> to the disk.  User-visible random nonsense in system catalogs seems
> like too much of a foot-gun to me.

I agree.  Committed as presented then.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Pre-v11 appearances of the word "procedure" in v11 docs
Следующее
От: Alexander Korotkov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] WIP: long transactions on hot standby feedback replica/ proof of concept