Re: Extension security improvement: Add support for extensions with an owned schema

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Extension security improvement: Add support for extensions with an owned schema
Дата
Msg-id CA+Tgmoao8nO9g4ZmqMRKmtkD3qLS8OxA-VmvjhAAXoAX96kxZA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Extension security improvement: Add support for extensions with an owned schema  (Jelte Fennema-Nio <me@jeltef.nl>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 1:50 PM Jelte Fennema-Nio <me@jeltef.nl> wrote:
> I do think, even if we have this, there would be other good reasons to
> use "owned schemas" for extension authors. At least the following two:
> 1. To have a safe search_path that can be used in SET search_path on a
> function (see also [1]).
> 2. To make it easy for extension authors to avoid conflicts with other
> extensions/UDFs.

(1) is a very good point. (2) I don't know about one way or the other.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Chapman Flack
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: jsonpath Time and Timestamp Special Cases
Следующее
От: jian he
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SQL/JSON query functions context_item doc entry and type requirement