Re: refactoring basebackup.c

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: refactoring basebackup.c
Дата
Msg-id CA+Tgmoan5itkVtmbHi_2kiYSwT_JWWT8tyNAZTvsFVtW7D4Z6Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: refactoring basebackup.c  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: refactoring basebackup.c  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 4:32 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> Some of the bbsink_libpq_* functions are directly calling pq_* e.g.
> bbsink_libpq_begin_backup whereas others are calling SendCopy*
> functions and therein those are calling pq_* functions.  I think
> bbsink_libpq_* function can directly call pq_* functions instead of
> adding one more level of the function call.

I think all the helper functions have more than one caller, though.
That's why I created them - to avoid duplicating code.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Add "-Wimplicit-fallthrough" to default flags (was Re: pgsql:Support FETCH FIRST WITH TIES)
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Our naming of wait events is a disaster.