Re: Our naming of wait events is a disaster.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: Our naming of wait events is a disaster.
Дата
Msg-id 20200512202726.GA31125@alvherre.pgsql
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Our naming of wait events is a disaster.  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Our naming of wait events is a disaster.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2020-May-12, Robert Haas wrote:

> That reminds me that it might be easier to maintain that table if we
> broke it up into one table per major category - that is, one table for
> lwlocks, one table for IPC, one table for IO, etc. - instead of a
> single table with a row-span number that is large and frequently
> updated incorrectly.

(Didn't we have a patch to generate the table programmatically?)

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: refactoring basebackup.c
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Our naming of wait events is a disaster.