Re: LWLockAcquire and LockBuffer mode argument

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: LWLockAcquire and LockBuffer mode argument
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoacBvwNu+N7K+oAynfyUuyh01Rjd0DQC_jSLziWdaun8g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: LWLockAcquire and LockBuffer mode argument  (ilmari@ilmari.org (Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker))
Ответы Re: LWLockAcquire and LockBuffer mode argument  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 7:47 AM Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
<ilmari@ilmari.org> wrote:
> Would it be possible to make the compat versions only available when
> building extensions, but not to core code?

I think that would be good if we can do it. We could even have it
inside #ifdef LWLOCK_API_COMPAT, and extension authors who want the
compatibility interface can define that.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: poc - possibility to write window function in PL languages
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: recovering from "found xmin ... from before relfrozenxid ..."