Re: ToDo: KNN Search should to support DISTINCT clasuse?
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: ToDo: KNN Search should to support DISTINCT clasuse? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+TgmoaOPohnaZSREZKHYBitE0_4eX2NZduGQGRHyxnNq2AL8Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: ToDo: KNN Search should to support DISTINCT clasuse? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: ToDo: KNN Search should to support DISTINCT clasuse?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes: >> but using DISTINCT breaks KNN searching optimization > >> postgres=# explain select distinct nazobce, nazobce <-> 'Benešov' from >> obce order by nazobce <-> 'Benešov' limit 10 > > Don't hold your breath. There are two ways the system could implement > the DISTINCT clause: either sort and uniq, or hashaggregate. > hashaggregate will destroy any input ordering, so there's no value in > using the index as input. Isn't that an implementation limitation though, rather than a fundamental limitation? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: