Re: [HACKERS] pgbench - allow to store select results into variables

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] pgbench - allow to store select results into variables
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoaEJKo8OxC_acmd6m3YB8R6yusUrxZARaBBin20x5AeMA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] pgbench - allow to store select results into variables  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 1:44 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> writes:
>> I have no doubt that some MUA around would forget to do the conversion.
>
> FWIW, one reason that I invariably use patch(1) to apply submitted patches
> is that it will take care of stripping any CRs that may have snuck in.
> So I'm not particularly fussed about the problem.

Yeah.  I think that we shouldn't care about this, or about
context/unified diffs, or really anything other than that patch can
apply it.  Once you apply it, you can issue the correct incantation to
see it in whatever format you prefer.  If it's a whole patch stack, it
makes sense to use 'git format-patch' to generate the patches, because
then it's a lot easier to apply the whole stack, but for a single
patch it really doesn't matter.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Pre-v11 appearances of the word "procedure" in v11 docs
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [patch] Duplicated pq_sendfloat4/8 prototypes