On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 12:35 PM Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2020-08-03 14:58, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
> > May be generated and identity columns are good things. I have nothing
> > against them.
> > But what preventing us from providing the similar behavior for
> > serial/bigseries types?
>
> In my mind, serial/bigserial is deprecated and it's not worth spending
> effort on patching them up.
>
> One thing we could do is change serial/bigserial to expand to identity
> column definitions instead of the current behavior.
I'm not really convinced that's a good idea. There's probably a lot of
people (me included) who are used to the way serial and bigserial work
and wouldn't necessarily be happy about a change. Plus, aren't the
generated columns still depending on an underlying sequence anyway?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company