Re: [HACKERS] A GUC to prevent leader processes from running subplans?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] A GUC to prevent leader processes from running subplans?
Дата
Msg-id CA+Tgmoa=AxuLKo2f1AKwLmvFoo3rr3j+SYHaJ5GVyx1PhhOJ0Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] A GUC to prevent leader processes from running subplans?  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] A GUC to prevent leader processes from runningsubplans?
Re: [HACKERS] A GUC to prevent leader processes from running subplans?
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:28 AM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Thanks.  You're right.  Rebased and updated to describe what "off" does.

Committed.  I noticed that you didn't add the new GUC to
postgresql.conf.sample, so I did that.  But then I thought it didn't
really belong in the section you put it, so I moved it to
RESOURCES_ASYNCHRONOUS.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods
Следующее
От: Jesper Pedersen
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] A GUC to prevent leader processes from runningsubplans?