Re: [HACKERS] A GUC to prevent leader processes from runningsubplans?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jesper Pedersen
Тема Re: [HACKERS] A GUC to prevent leader processes from runningsubplans?
Дата
Msg-id 000f92d6-f623-95a5-b341-46e2c0495cea@redhat.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] A GUC to prevent leader processes from running subplans?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] A GUC to prevent leader processes from running subplans?
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On 11/15/2017 08:28 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:28 AM, Thomas Munro
> <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> Thanks.  You're right.  Rebased and updated to describe what "off" does.
> 
> Committed.  I noticed that you didn't add the new GUC to
> postgresql.conf.sample, so I did that.  But then I thought it didn't
> really belong in the section you put it, so I moved it to
> RESOURCES_ASYNCHRONOUS.
> 

Small typo.

Best regards,
  Jesper
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] A GUC to prevent leader processes from running subplans?
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Hash take II