Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)
Дата
Msg-id CA+Tgmoa3KMn5C0RHeWDeYx4J7qU_dLkc=fOqdcqn4cHbtoBs8w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>> But even before that, you have to ask whether what it's supposed to do
>> is something we want.
>
> The reviewer can't usually answer that though.

They can answer whether THEY want it, though.  And Tom, Andrew, and I
all just got through arguing that that is one of the most, if not the
most, important parts of a review.

Seriously.  Opinions are good.  Lack of opinions leads to "ivory
tower" syndrome, which of course we've got, but I think most of us are
sufficiently self-aware to at least know that it isn't a good thing.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: count(*) of zero rows returns 1
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_dump transaction's read-only mode