On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> Perhaps this type should be called pglsn, since it's an
> implementation-specific detail and not a universal concept like int,
> point, or uuid.
If we're going to do that, I suggest pg_lsn rather than pglsn. We
already have pg_node_tree, so using underscores for separation would
be more consistent.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company