Re: [HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] Is it necessary to rewrite table while increasing the scale of datatype numeric?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] Is it necessary to rewrite table while increasing the scale of datatype numeric?
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoZt+XYpEhHis8dp6PDgaMTXfr6dK-GNedyJH4ZVs0WUAg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] Is it necessary to rewrite table while increasing the scale of datatype numeric?  (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] Is it necessary to rewrite table while increasing the scale of datatype numeric?  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] Is it necessary to rewrite table while increasing the scale of datatype numeric?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> wrote:
> But I wonder if we could just declare that that's not what the scale typmod
> does. That it's just a maximum scale but it's perfectly valid for NUMERIC
> data with lower scales to be stored in a column than the typmod says. In a
> way the current behaviour is like bpchar but it would be nice if it was more
> like varchar

Sure, but the point is that 5.0000 is not the same as 5.000 today.  If
you start whacking this around you'll be changing that behavior, I
think.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeremy Harris
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: regression tests
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: regression tests