Re: pg_walsummary, Character-not-present-in-option

On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 12:08 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> btsugieyuusuke <btsugieyuusuke@oss.nttdata.com> writes:
> >> Therefore, shouldn't “f:” and “w:” be removed?
>
> Looks like that to me too.  Pushed.

Thanks to Yusuke-san for the report and patch and to Tom for the
commit. I vaguely recall that early in the development of
pg_walsummary I thought it was going to need more options than and
then realized that some of them weren't necessary. Looks like I did a
bad job removing the leftovers; thanks for cleaning it up.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com