On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 8:35 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> Here's an idea. Why don't we move the function/opclass creation lines
> to insert.sql, without the DROPs, and use the same functions/opclasses
> in the three tests insert.sql, alter_table.sql, hash_part.sql and
> partition_prune.sql, i.e. not recreate what are essentially the same
> objects three times? This also leaves them around for the pg_upgrade
> test, which is not a bad thing.
That sounds good, but maybe we should go further and move the
partitioning tests out of generically-named things like insert.sql
altogether and have test names that actually mention partitioning.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company