On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
>> On 12/17/13, 8:16 PM, Maciek Sakrejda wrote:
>>> (now with patch--sorry about that)
>>
>> This patch doesn't apply.
>
> There are some recent changes around same place which broke this
> patch. Please find the modified patch attached with this mail, I had
> changed order of specifying vacuum_freeze_min_age and
> vacuum_freeze_table_age in Vacuum FREEZE option.
>
> I will mark this patch as Ready For Committer, unless there is
> any other objection for this patch.
Committed with a grammatical correction.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company