On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> My radical proposal therefore would have been to embrace this
> inconsistency and get rid of PGC_BACKEND and PGC_SU_BACKEND altogether,
> relying on users interpreting the parameter names to indicate that
> changing them later may or may not have an effect. Unfortunately, the
> concerns about ignore_system_indexes prevent that.
What exactly are those concerns? Do you have a link to previous discussion?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company