On 12/8/14 12:39 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
>> My radical proposal therefore would have been to embrace this
>> inconsistency and get rid of PGC_BACKEND and PGC_SU_BACKEND altogether,
>> relying on users interpreting the parameter names to indicate that
>> changing them later may or may not have an effect. Unfortunately, the
>> concerns about ignore_system_indexes prevent that.
>
> What exactly are those concerns? Do you have a link to previous discussion?
Earlier in the thread:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20108.1415120322@sss.pgh.pa.us