On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 9:41 PM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> On 2017/08/02 20:40, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 3:46 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
>> <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>> If the user has specified "not valid" for a constraint on the foreign
>>> table, there is high chance that s/he is aware of the fact that the
>>> remote table that the foreign table points to has some rows which will
>>> violet the constraint. So, +1.
>>
>> +1 from me, too.
>
> Alright, thanks.
>
> Attached is a patch. I think this could be considered a bug-fix,
> backpatchable to 9.6 which introduced this behavior change [1].
I could go either way on that. It's not inconceivable somebody could
be unhappy about seeing this behavior change in a minor release.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company