Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoZU9nBd6m3NQohzjpdvBNtw+6UGoz+uqoaawkXy76gYSg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:28 AM, Andrew Dunstan
<andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Well, we'd be getting rid of it because of a danger of data loss which we
> can't otherwise mitigate. Maybe it does need to be backpatched, even if we
> haven't had complaints.

What's wrong with the approach proposed in
http://postgr.es/m/55AFC302.1060805@iki.fi ?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: untrusted PLs should be GRANTable
Следующее
От: Etsuro Fujita
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partitionwise join enabled.