Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Dunstan
Тема Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?
Дата
Msg-id 3c1cf991-8846-9a6f-c669-e21f8ea9a6a4@2ndQuadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers

On 07/16/2018 08:01 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
>
> I doubt as well that we'd be able to catch all the holes as well as the
> conditions where the optimization could be run safely are rather
> basically impossible to catch beforehand.  I'd like to vote for getting
> rid of this optimization for COPY, this can hurt more than it is
> helpful.  Per the lack of complaints, this could happen only in HEAD?


Well, we'd be getting rid of it because of a danger of data loss which 
we can't otherwise mitigate. Maybe it does need to be backpatched, even 
if we haven't had complaints.

cheers

andrew

-- 
Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Haribabu Kommi
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority
Следующее
От: Dean Rasheed
Дата:
Сообщение: PG 10: could not generate random cancel key