Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoZKh8Ab-V5a7i0wPK8DyOEUX8RpKfG9y2YYW86mO943Rw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 7:11 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> [pile^2]  Also, what is the rationale for locking the target buffer
> but not the source buffer?  That seems pretty hard to justify from
> here, even granting the assumption that we don't expect any other
> processes to be interested in these buffers (which I don't grant,
> because checkpointer).

Ooph. I agree.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Следующее
От: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: An attempt to avoid locally-committed-but-not-replicated-to-standby-transactions in synchronous replication