Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Дата
Msg-id 3681339.1659654673@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
I wrote:
> And while I'm piling on, how is this bit in RelationCopyStorageUsingBuffer
> not completely broken?

[pile^2]  Also, what is the rationale for locking the target buffer
but not the source buffer?  That seems pretty hard to justify from
here, even granting the assumption that we don't expect any other
processes to be interested in these buffers (which I don't grant,
because checkpointer).

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints