On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> I think a few more things could removed/simplified after the recent
> round of port removal:
>
> - Remove definition of offsetof() in c.h
I see no particular virtue to getting rid of this.
> - (Side point, the definition of endof() in the same place isn't used
> anywhere, and doesn't look safe to me, because it can go one past the
> end of memory.)
That I think we could remove.
> - Remove strtol, strtoul, strdup from libpgport. I seem to recall these
> were for nextstep at some point. Before we applied libpgport
> everywhere, we were actually already going fine without these in some
> parts of the source tree.
+1 for removing these and seeing if anyone complains. We can always
put 'em back if there's a problem.
> Some more risky things that can only be tested at run time;
>
> - We could use fflush(NULL) in src/backend/postmaster/fork_process.c.
>
> - There is some business about realloc(NULL) not working in
> src/interfaces/libpq/fe-exec.c.
I doubt that either of these things is worth changing. It seems
unlikely it would save anything material, and it might break again in
some future port.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company