Re: Comment on GatherPath.single_copy

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Comment on GatherPath.single_copy
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoYgMGBc+GWfdv48Ufqbo30i85Unc4jNiMGw0hr2av+K0w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Comment on GatherPath.single_copy  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Comment on GatherPath.single_copy  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes:
>> -     bool            single_copy;    /* path must not be executed >1x */
>> +     bool            single_copy;    /* path must not span on multiple processes */
>
> I agree that the existing comment sucks, but this isn't a lot better
> (and it will probably not look nice after pgindent gets done with it).
> Possibly it's too complicated to jam a reasonable explanation into the
> same-line comment, and what is needed is to expand the sentence about
> it in the comment above the struct.
>
> Robert, could you fix the documentation for that field so it's
> intelligible?

Uh, maybe.  The trick, as you've already noted, is finding something
better.  Maybe this:

-    bool        single_copy;    /* path must not be executed >1x */
+    bool        single_copy;    /* don't execute path in multiple processes */

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Missing checks when malloc returns NULL...
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Aggregate Push Down - Performing aggregation on foreign server