Re: Remaining 9.5 open items

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Remaining 9.5 open items
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoYeZfFE-u28JNKHV4xp6k83G4vcnYphUAbSadFV6KJZSA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Remaining 9.5 open items  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Ответы Re: Remaining 9.5 open items  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> * Alvaro Herrera (alvherre@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
>> Stephen Frost wrote:
>> > Still, I'll get a patch worked up for it and then we can discuss the
>> > merits of that patch going in to 9.5 now versus just into HEAD.
>>
>> Cool.
>
> While working on the DROP OWNED BY patch, and part of what took me a bit
> longer with it, I came to the realiziation that ALTER POLICY wasn't
> handling dependencies quite right.  All of the policy's dependencies
> would be dropped, but then only those objects referred to in the ALTER
> POLICY command would have dependencies recreated for them.
>
> The attached patch fixes that (using the same approach that I used in
> the DROP OWNED BY patch).
>
> Comments welcome, as always.
>
> I'll plan to apply these two patches in a couple of days.

It's been a week?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [DOCS] max_worker_processes on the standby
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Patch: fix lock contention for HASHHDR.mutex