Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoYcCCXRrZAC88C6k81fakNdmFJTgmrKiHmNW97M1s0eZw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 6:00 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> I still haven't seen a credible model for being able to apply a stream
> of interleaved transactions that can roll back individually; I think we
> really need the ability to have multiple transactions alive in one
> backend for that.

Hmm, yeah, that's a problem.  That smells like autonomous transactions.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Claudio Freire
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ParallelFinish-hook of FDW/CSP (Re: [HACKERS] Steps inside ExecEndGather)
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take