Re: Pluggable toaster

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Pluggable toaster
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoYOZ0Ofoo1DJ+iRa6Mg8MACu0eb8tr-uggfNMZmD6bpkA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Pluggable toaster  (Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>)
Ответы Re: Pluggable toaster  (Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc@gmail.com>)
Re: Pluggable toaster  (Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 11:40 AM Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru> wrote:
> We are working on custom toaster for JSONB [1], because current TOAST is
> universal for any data type and because of that it has some disadvantages:
>     - "one toast fits all"  may be not the best solution for particular
>       type or/and use cases
>     - it doesn't know the internal structure of data type, so it  cannot
>       choose an optimal toast strategy
>     - it can't  share common parts between different rows and even
>       versions of rows

I agree ... but I'm also worried about what happens when we have
multiple table AMs. One can imagine a new table AM that is
specifically optimized for TOAST which can be used with an existing
heap table. One can imagine a new table AM for the main table that
wants to use something different for TOAST. So, I don't think it's
right to imagine that the choice of TOASTer depends solely on the
column data type. I'm not really sure how this should work exactly ...
but it needs careful thought.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Shawn Debnath
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: MultiXact\SLRU buffers configuration
Следующее
От: Shruthi Gowda
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: preserving db/ts/relfilenode OIDs across pg_upgrade (was Re: storing an explicit nonce)