Re: pg_dump versus rules, once again

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: pg_dump versus rules, once again
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoY5FH_EdUom98tqt=CNdmAS2AkM8zRv8Ru-T+diZZpEBQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_dump versus rules, once again  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: pg_dump versus rules, once again
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> The changes in pg_backup_archiver.c would have to be back-patched
> into all versions supporting --if-exists, so that they don't fail
> on dump archives produced by patched versions.

Even if you patch future minor releases, past minor releases are still
going to exist out there in the wild for a long, long time.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_dump versus rules, once again
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Unlogged tables cleanup