Re: [POC] FETCH limited by bytes.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [POC] FETCH limited by bytes.
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoY4HCEZMkcpo4tVfMxZPgF1A-a8z1UyXZ3A2uHqPe+GbQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [POC] FETCH limited by bytes.  (Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [POC] FETCH limited by bytes.  (Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com> wrote:
>> - We could consider folding fetch_size into "Remote Execution
>> Options", but maybe that's too clever.
>
> If you care to explain, I'm listening. Otherwise I'm going forward with the
> other suggestions you've made.

It's just a little unfortunate to have multiple sections with only a
single option in each.  It would be nice to avoid that somehow.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 2016-01 Commitfest
Следующее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: why pg_size_pretty is volatile?