On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 9:54 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> Okay. So, based on this feedback, I guess that something like the
> attached would be what we are looking for. I have maximized the
> amount of code removed with the removal of -z/-Z, but I won't fight
> hard if the consensus is to keep them, either. We could also keep
> -z/--gzip, and stick -Z to the new --compression-level with
> --compress removed.
I mean, I really don't understand the benefit of removing -z and -Z.
-z can remain a synonym for --client-compress=gzip and -Z for
--client-compress=gzip --compression-level=$N and nobody will be
harmed. Taking them out reduces backward compatibility for no gain
that I can see.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com