Re: Request for vote to move forward with recovery.conf overhaul

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Request for vote to move forward with recovery.conf overhaul
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoY+EAK6TaLXPSLxf1SBKFMeaybBso_q6M_PBUsRPh17tg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Request for vote to move forward with recovery.conf overhaul  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Request for vote to move forward with recovery.conf overhaul  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, that is one of the most important patches in the list, and I could put
> some effort in it for either review or coding.

I think it would be great if you could elaborate on your reasons for
feeling that this patch is particularly important.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: Slave enters in recovery and promotes when WAL stream with master is cut + delay master/slave
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)