Thanks, applied.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Neel Patel
<neel.patel@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Please find attached modified patch file. Do review it and let us know for
> comments.
>
> Thanks,
> Neel Patel
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Neel Patel <neel.patel@enterprisedb.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Dave,
>> >
>> > make sense. We should ensure that operations happen sequentially.
>> > Please find attached patch file for the fix.
>>
>> Hmm, using synchronous calls is not an option either. They're strongly
>> discouraged, and will throw warnings on some browsers.
>>
>> Can we not just have the first callback initiate the next call and so on?
>
>
> hmm.. Yes we achieved the same. Please find attached modified patch file.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dave Page
>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>
>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
>
>
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company