Re: PGAdmin Version 2.1

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dave Page
Тема Re: PGAdmin Version 2.1
Дата
Msg-id CA+OCxowRk6=uz2D7FnP4X-eZxs5FfGdkFu2CNjYrYiaDLrSw=A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PGAdmin Version 2.1  (Melvin Davidson <melvin6925@yahoo.com>)
Список pgadmin-support


On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 3:22 PM, Melvin Davidson <melvin6925@yahoo.com> wrote:
>No - if you switch on "Show system objects", it will display system objects such as row 
>types. That's the whole point of the switch (which is off by default). 

Except that "system objects" are NOT USER tables, views, indexes, etc.

They are _system_ catalogs and views;

Not in nearly 20 years of pgAdmin history they haven't been. We've always classed them as system catalogs etc. *and* objects that are implementation details of higher level objects.
 

Your definition is a behavior change from PgAdmin III, which DID NOT show
every "system object" per your definition". It only showed USER types as per
my query.

No it didn't. See the attached screenshot.

Why would you force objects like these to be permanently hidden? It's quite reasonable to want to see them - they can be quite useful when writing stored procedures that deal with rows for example.
 
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Вложения

В списке pgadmin-support по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Melvin Davidson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PGAdmin Version 2.1
Следующее
От: Raymond O'Donnell
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgAdmin4 from apt.postgresql.org