Re: PGAdmin Version 2.1
>No - if you switch on "Show system objects", it will display system objects such as row
>types. That's the whole point of the switch (which is off by default).
Except that "system objects" are NOT USER tables, views, indexes, etc.
They are _system_ catalogs and views;
Your definition is a behavior change from PgAdmin III, which DID NOT show
every "system object" per your definition". It only showed USER types as per
my query.
Melvin Davidson 🎸
I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.
www.youtube.com/unusedhero/videos
Folk Alley - All Folk - 24 Hours a day
www.folkalley.com
I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.
www.youtube.com/unusedhero/videos
Folk Alley - All Folk - 24 Hours a day
www.folkalley.com
On Tuesday, January 30, 2018, 10:01:50 AM EST, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Melvin Davidson <melvin6925@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Effectively, a composite type that can represent a row in a classThat may be true, but users expect to see "user defined types", not tables and views. As such, the query driving the display should be something like:WITH types AS
( SELECT reltype
FROM pg_class
WHERE relkind = 'c'
)
SELECT *
FROM pg_type
WHERE oid in (SELECT reltype
FROM types)
ORDER BY typname;
No need to duplicate everything else.
No - if you switch on "Show system objects", it will display system objects such as row types. That's the whole point of the switch (which is off by default).
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgadmin-support по дате отправления: