On Sep 10, 2006, at 5:21 , Tom Lane wrote:
> In the category of "egad", I found out that the tinterval datatype
> uses
> << for "contains"! This is simply bizarre --- whether you approve of
> the inet-like notation or not, surely the arrows are pointing the
> wrong
> way. Given that tinterval is deprecated and not even documented,
> maybe
> this isn't worth fixing. Any thoughts?
I'd say leave tinterval as it is. If it's ever updated to use the
modern time types (rather than abstime), that would be a logical time
to change it, it seems to me.
Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net